SYNQ
Discuss your project

Truck&Co

01 / 2026 · Fleet Management

A complete workspace for routes, loads, drivers, documents, and vehicle service.

Role
Product design and frontend
Focus
Fleet planning and operational workflows
Status
Implemented client system · anonymized
Read case study

Transport & Logistics

Mid-sized transport and logistics operator

Challenge

Routes, loads, vehicles, and drivers were planned in separate views. Changes were difficult to trace, and handovers between dispatch and drivers were prone to errors.

Implementation

A shared dispatch workspace connects route planning, capacity checks, vehicle status, and driver assignment. Conflicts appear directly in the relevant planning step.

System view

The project view shows a continuous planning path with traceable changes down to the individual trip.

Truck&Co — Case study

Editorial case narrative

A visual account of the work, built only from confirmed scope and behavior visible in the project material.

  1. Context Transport & Logistics
  2. System Fleet planning and operational workflows
  3. Evidence Working view
Truck&CoFleet Management · 2026
Role
Product design and frontend
Focus
Fleet planning and operational workflows
Status
Implemented client system · anonymized

Overview

A complete workspace for routes, loads, drivers, documents, and vehicle service.

Challenge

Routes, loads, vehicles, and drivers were planned in separate views. Changes were difficult to trace, and handovers between dispatch and drivers were prone to errors.

Implementation

A shared dispatch workspace connects route planning, capacity checks, vehicle status, and driver assignment. Conflicts appear directly in the relevant planning step.

Explore the complete case8 documented fields

01 · Context

Mid-sized transport and logistics operator. A complete workspace for routes, loads, drivers, documents, and vehicle service.

Reconstructed from the visible product and recorded scope. It does not add undisclosed client facts or measured outcomes.

02 · Starting point

Routes, loads, vehicles, and drivers were planned in separate views. Changes were difficult to trace, and handovers between dispatch and drivers were prone to errors.

Operational steps were spread across separate views. Planning, vehicle status, and documentation needed to come together in one calm workflow.

03 · People and responsibility

Dispatchers, fleet coordinators, drivers, and service staff need the same route and vehicle context for different decisions.

  • Role: Product design and frontend
  • Focus: Fleet planning and operational workflows
  • Status: Implemented client system · anonymized

04 · Workflow

A planner opens the week, checks a load against capacity, assigns vehicle and driver, then follows the same context into shipment details, documents, and service.

The route connects overview, decision, and detail so that state changes and handoffs remain traceable.

05 · Product decisions

A shared dispatch workspace connects route planning, capacity checks, vehicle status, and driver assignment. Conflicts appear directly in the relevant planning step.

  • Use the route to organise load, stage, vehicle, and driver.
  • Place capacity and assignment beside the planning decision.
  • Preserve context when moving into documents or maintenance.

06 · System and safeguards

The system logic centres on Fleet planning and operational workflows. Critical states remain visible at the point of work.

  • Assignments stay legible at week and route level.
  • Vehicle and driver context follows the load.
  • Linked service data does not imply production telematics.

07 · Validation

Review covers route selection, capacity comparison, assignment, shipment detail, and service record on desktop and mobile.

The interactive project view provides an inspectable state for the interface, navigation, and visible rules.

08 · Result and handover

A responsive dashboard with direct weekly planning, clear load assignments, and connected detail views for daily fleet operations.

The project view shows a continuous planning path with traceable changes down to the individual trip.

The anonymised account documents the interaction model while leaving identity, volumes, production systems, and measured fleet results undisclosed.

Customer identity, production integrations, adoption figures, and measured outcomes remain omitted where public evidence is not available.

01 / Challenge

Operational steps were spread across separate views. Planning, vehicle status, and documentation needed to come together in one calm workflow.

02 / System view

A responsive dashboard with direct weekly planning, clear load assignments, and connected detail views for daily fleet operations.

More projects

Continue to another project detail.

Project view

Project